Post by Chuck LampreyInstead of renaming the months, thought should be given to simply
renumbering them so that the Latin root words line up properly. This
means
Post by Chuck Lampreythat the year should begin on March 1st. (March is month #1). September
thru December are now months 7-10 as they should be.
This solution would also match the official year with the astrological
year
Post by Chuck Lamprey(or close to it) for those who feel this is desirable.
One might also notice that the year would now end on February 28th, or
29th - thus the "leap day" would be added at the end of the year which
seems
Post by Chuck Lampreyesthetically desirable.
Granted. this isnt linguistics, but newsgroup readers have to be ready for
anything.
vel3.net...
el3.net...
Post by Pat DurkinIt seems to me that numbering months is uninspired, someone should
run
Post by Pat Durkina contest to rename the malnumbered "September" (7th), "October"
(8th),
Post by Pat Durkin"November" (9th), and "December" (10th). Any suggestions?
November, December, Unidecember, and Duodecember.
I trust your Latin over mine. I was trying for Ondecember and
Docember.
Post by Pat Durkin( and dropping July and August, of course. The Romans may have
considered
Post by Pat DurkinJulie and Gus as gods but I don't.)
Never trust my Latin. I worked backwards from duodecimal (which is a
word) to Duodecember to Unidecember.
If we had the ability to do that, then I'd say forget that reform and go for
something much more practical: Replace the current calendar system by one of
the calendar systems which have been proposed in which, if you know the
date, you can find with some quick mental calculation what day of the week
it is. (You can do that with the present system, but I wouldn't consider it
an easy calculation.) In one system proposed by Isaac Asimov, every year's
calendar was exactly the same, except for certain leap days.
Now that I think about it, there *is* one aspect which might make such a
reform more difficult than that which you are proposing. In your system,
weeks would stay seven days. In some of the proposals which I have seen,
including Asimov's, the leap days would not be counted as part of the
surrounding weeks, so that a Sunday after the leap day(s) might follow 8 or
9 days after the Sunday before the leap day(s). The same thing would happen
to Friday and Saturday. I would think this would make such a reform totally
unacceptable to many Christians, Jews, and Muslims.
changes to the calendar.