Garrett Wollman
2024-12-03 18:29:53 UTC
Reply
Permalinkfreqently. I had a hunch that the common use of shorter, more precise
numerical times ("1:00" or "1300") would have driven this form out of
writing. I went to ngram viewer and was a little surprised at what I
saw: the peak is actually in the middle 19th century, and the
frequency of "o'clock" has actually risen a bit in recent years.
For some reason, the peaks in the eng_GB corpus is about 20 years
earlier than the peak in eng_US, but whne combined, the US peak
overwhelms the GB peak.
<https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=o%27clock%3Aeng_us%2Co%27clock%3Aeng_gb&year_start=1800&year_end=2022&corpus=en&smoothing=3>
-GAWollman
--
Garrett A. Wollman | "Act to avoid constraining the future; if you can,
***@bimajority.org| act to remove constraint from the future. This is
Opinions not shared by| a thing you can do, are able to do, to do together."
my employers. | - Graydon Saunders, _A Succession of Bad Days_ (2015)
Garrett A. Wollman | "Act to avoid constraining the future; if you can,
***@bimajority.org| act to remove constraint from the future. This is
Opinions not shared by| a thing you can do, are able to do, to do together."
my employers. | - Graydon Saunders, _A Succession of Bad Days_ (2015)