Post by Robert BannisterPost by Tony CooperThere is nothing suburb-like about Brooklyn, but calling Brooklyn a
suburb of NYC became a running joke.
I seem to remember that we discovered Americans have a different concept
of what a suburb is from others.
To summarize:
- AmE "suburb" is a part of an urbanized area that is contiguous with,
but politically and socially distinct from, the central city (or one
of the central cities) of its metropolitan area. "Sub-" in this case
can be glossed as "smaller than, of less importance". Historically
suburbs were legally towns, villages, or unincorporated areas, not
cities in their own right, and many still are.
- OtherE "suburb" is an area of a city (or other sort of municipality,
as the case may be). "Sub-" as in "subordinate to, a component of".
AmE would use "borough" here ONLY in the case of New York City,
London, or to translate the French "arrondissement"; for such places
as they exist in the US, "neighborhood", "district", "ward" (as in an
electoral district), "area", "village" (in places where that does not
have a legally defined meaning), and in the specific context of the
Census, "populated place" or "Census-defined place".
In some places with a long history of development, we can talk about
the "first (second, ...) ring suburbs", which are the suburbs that are
closest (and generally developed first) to their central city;
improvements in transportation technology made it practical for people
to live greater and greater distances away from major employment
centers, so the layout of suburbs reflects the prevalent mode of
transportation when they were developed.
Out beyond the suburbs are the exurbs. These areas are even lower in
density than the suburbs, but still form a part of some metropolitan
commutershed (sometimes even more than one). These are often the
places where the industries that provide commercial services to the
suburbs locate -- landscaping, parcel delivery, telecommunications,
distribution centers, etc.
-GAWollman
--
Garrett A. Wollman | What intellectual phenomenon can be older, or more oft
***@bimajority.org| repeated, than the story of a large research program
Opinions not shared by| that impaled itself upon a false central assumption
my employers. | accepted by all practitioners? - S.J. Gould, 1993