Post by Athel Cornish-BowdenPost by Peter MoylanWhile writing that, I looked up the red-bellied black on Wikipedia.
"Averaging around 1.25 m (4 ft 1 in) in length [...]". Someone must
think that that extra inch matters.
Or someone used a website (for example
Indeed, someone used a web site: Wikipedia.
Post by Athel Cornish-BowdenAveraging around {{convert|1.25|m|abbr=on}} in length,
As you might imagine, the {{convert}} template is extremely
complicated and has voluminous documentation:
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Convert/doc>. There is
certainly an option to round the conversion properly, but it seems
likely that the editor didn't want to take the time to figure out how
to do it.
(If I had been me, I would also have written "125 cm" rather than
"1.25 m" as the latter suggests more precision than seems warranted,
despite the two representations being formally equivalent. So I think
that should have been {{convert|125|cm|ft|0}} but I can't easily test
that right now.)
-GAWollman
--
Garrett A. Wollman | "Act to avoid constraining the future; if you can,
***@bimajority.org| act to remove constraint from the future. This is
Opinions not shared by| a thing you can do, are able to do, to do together."
my employers. | - Graydon Saunders, _A Succession of Bad Days_ (2015)