Discussion:
a commando's
Add Reply
navi
2024-11-24 01:04:45 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Which are correct:

1) He had a commando's training.
2) He had a commandos' training.
3) He had a commandos training.

4) I subscribed to a commando's magazine.
5) I subscribed to a commandos' magazine.
6) I subscribed to a commandos magazine.

I don't think that there are magazines for commandos, but I am not sure.
It would probably not be surprising these days. At any rate, I think the
structure should be like that of 'a women's magazine' but I think in
English in such cases a set pattern does not apply in every case.


--
Gratefully,
Navi

Lost in the Twilight Zone of the English language
Obsessed with ambiguity
Interested in strange structures
Peter Moylan
2024-11-24 04:15:50 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by navi
1) He had a commando's training.
2) He had a commandos' training.
3) He had a commandos training.
4) He had commando training.
--
Peter Moylan ***@pmoylan.org http://www.pmoylan.org
Newcastle, NSW
Athel Cornish-Bowden
2024-11-24 07:21:49 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Peter Moylan
Post by navi
1) He had a commando's training.
2) He had a commandos' training.
3) He had a commandos training.
4) He had commando training.
4 is correct. All of the others are a bit weird.
--
Athel -- French and British, living in Marseilles for 37 years; mainly
in England until 1987.
Snidely
2024-11-24 11:28:09 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Athel Cornish-Bowden
Post by Peter Moylan
Post by navi
1) He had a commando's training.
2) He had a commandos' training.
3) He had a commandos training.
4) He had commando training.
4 is correct. All of the others are a bit weird.
1) Could be used in certain special locutions:

1+) He had a commando's training and a juggler's timing.

(I'm sure there are better combinations to illustrate with, but this
one will do for now)

/dps
--
And the Raiders and the Broncos have life now in the West. I thought
they were both nearly dead if not quite really most sincerely dead. --
Mike Salfino, fivethirtyeight.com
Loading...